people v. nickerson

people v. nickerson - THE PEOPLE, ex rel. I. NICKERSON, v....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
THE PEOPLE, ex rel. I. NICKERSON, v. [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL] SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF NEW YORK 19 Wend. 16; 1837 N.Y. LEXIS 188 August, 1837, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] HABEAS CORPUS in the case of a minor child, on the question of its custody, as between the parents. The mother in this case had withdrawn herself from the protection of her husband and went to reside in the house of her father, and took with her an infant child; to obtain the custody of which the father sued out a habeas corpus. On the return of the writ numerous affidavits were produced on both sides, and after hearing counsel, the following opinion was delivered: HEADNOTES: Father, the Natural Guardian of Children and Entitled to Their Custody--Court may Award Custody to Mother-- Statute-- Separation of Father and Mother. The father is the natural guardian of his infant children, and in the absence of ill usage, grossly immoral principles or habits, or want of ability to provide for his children, is entitled to their custody, care and education; and cannot, at common law, be controlled by the courts in the exercise of his paternal rights, except as above, or for an abuse of the trust confided to him by law. By statute, this court on the application of the mother, where a husband and wife live in a state of separation without being divorced, may award the charge and custody of such children to the mother. It seems, however, that this power will be exercised only in cases of a separation of husband and wife by judicial decree or by mutual consent; and not where the wife of her own accord without justifiable cause withdraws herself from the protection of her husband. It also seems, that a separation without consent will not be approved except where a divorce a vinculo matrimonii , or a mensa et thoro would be decreed by a Court of Chancery. Citations--1 Str., 579; 2 Ld. Raym., 1334; 3 Burr., 1436; 5 East 221; 9 J. B. Moore, 278; 10 Ves., 51; 12 Ves., 492; 2 Russ., 1, 9; Jacob, 245; 4 Cond. Ch., 115, 120; 2 Sim., 35; 2 Cond. Ch., 299; 8 Johns. 328; 2 Kent, Com., 194, 220; 1 Dow, N. S., 152; 2 Fonbl., 232, n. ; 2 Bro. C.C., 101, Lofft., 74, 78; 1 Dow. P. C., 81; 2 Cox, 242; 2 R. S., 145-147, secs. 6, 7, art. 3, 4; 148, 149, secs. 1, 2, 3; 150, sec. 1. JUDGES: Nelson, Ch. J. OPINIONBY: NELSON OPINION: [*16] By the Court , Nelson, Ch. J. The father is the natural guardian of his infant children, and in the absence of good and sufficient reasons shown to the court, such as ill usage, grossly immoral principles or habits, want of ability, etc., is entitled to their custody, care and education. All the authorities concur on this point. 1 Str., 579; 2 Ld. Raym,, 1334; 3 Burr., 1436; 5 East 221; 9 J. B. Moore 278; 10 Ves., 51; 12 Ves. 492; 2 Russ. 1; Jacob, 245, and notes to the case; 4 Cond. Ch. 115; 2 Simon 35; 2 Cond. Ch. 299; 8 Johns. 328; 2 Kent, Com., 220, 194; 1 Dow. N. S. 152; 2 Fonbl. 232, [**2]
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 3

people v. nickerson - THE PEOPLE, ex rel. I. NICKERSON, v....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online