{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

08ECO100OutlineConsumerChoiceI

# E lots of y and little x 6 f lots of x and little y 15

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: f indiff curve @[x,y] = M RS(i.e: tangent/[x,y] at point [x,y] => MUx/MUy 4. Convex Shape due to diminishing marginial utility 5.e -> lots of y and little x 6. f -> lots of x and little y 15 / 21 Indifference Curves Indifference Curve “Results” Indifference Curve: All {X , Y } combinations giving same utility level Northeast Rule any point on i1 better than any point on i2 ----------------------indiff curve for every [x,y] combination ----------------------cannot bend backwards ---------------------connot cross Gazzale (University of Toronto) ECO100: Consumer Choice I i1 i2 16 / 21 Indifference Curves Marginal Rate of Substitution: Summary Deﬁnition MRSX ,Y Given {X , Y , . . . , Z }, how many units of Y must you give me to exactly compensate me for taking away one unit of X ? We Can Show ￿ ￿ MRSX ,Y X , Y , . . . , Z = MUX MUY 2-Good Case With x on the horizontal and y on the vertical, the |slope| of the MUx indifference curve at {x , y } equals MRSx ,y (x , y ) = MUy Interpretation: Trades I am willing to make I am willing to give up |MRS | units of Y in order to get 1 more unit of X . Example Gazzale (University of Toronto) ECO100: Consumer Choice I 17 / 21 \$1Bill MRS steep io \$1 bills vs. \$5 bills EX. Left and Right shoes Computer and keyboard MRS small/ ie ﬂat ' Standard' indifference curve general willingness to substitute diminishing MRS io \$5 Bill Perfect Substitues Constant M RS io Perfect complements inability to substitute M RS undeﬁned at kink The Budget Constraint Now: What can I buy? A Consumer’s Two-Good Budget Constraint Goods X and Y with prices PX and PY Assume consumer spends all income, denoted I Consumption choice must satisfy PX X + PY Y = I More generally, saving/borrow as good “Z ” Gazzale (University of Toronto) ECO100: Consumer Choice I 18 / 21 The Budget Constraint Two-Good Budget Line (Constraint), Graphically I = 90, Px = 3; Py = 9 income Quantity Y Intercept!: buy only Y>90/9 = 10 buy only X>90/3 = 30 --------Slope of budget line abs(rise/run)= (income/py)/ (income/px) =px/py 25 UNAFFORDABLE 20 15 10 Budget line Spend all of your income 5 AFFORDABLE 5 Gazzale (University of Toronto) 10 15 20 ECO100: Consumer Choice I 25 30 Quantity X 19 / 21 The Budget Constraint Budget Line, Interpreted P Slope of the budget constraint (budget line): − PX Y Interpretation I: Trades I can make with the market I must give up |slope| units of Y (the vertical one) in order to get 1 more unit of X (the horizontal one). Our example: I must give up 1 units of Y (the \$9 one) in order to 3 get 1 more unit X (the \$3 one) Alternatively: I must give up more unit of Y . 1 |slope| = 3 units of X in order to get 1 Interpretation II: X ’s Opportunity Cost (in terms of Y ) Gazzale (University of Toronto) ECO100: Consumer Choice I 20 / 21 Optimal Choice Optimal Choice 1. Northeast Rule A -> Optimum Slope Budget line = MRS px/py = MUx/MUy MUx/px = MUy/py(i.e Last Dollar Rule) --------------------B cannot be optimum At B MRS = 3/2 != slope of BL = 1/3 MUx/MUy!=Px/Py => MUx/ Px > MUy/Py(need to spend m ore on x) Gazzale (University of Toronto) ECO100: Consumer Choice I 21 / 21...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online