March+1

March+1 - Current Moral Problems Lecture March 1 Should...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Current Moral Problems Lecture March 1 Should Voluntary Active Euthanasia (VAE) Be Legalized? Stephen Potts: Objections to the Institutionalization of Euthanasia Potts Position He opposes legalizing VAE VAE is not necessarily unethical: I object, not so much to individual acts of euthanasia, but to institutionalising it as a practice (SE, p. 81). Institutionalization: Legalization, acceptance in health care institutions, and acceptance by professional organizations, such as the AMA A Critical Analysis of Potts Reasons for Not Legalizing VAE First Reason: Reduced Pressure to Improve Curative or Symptomatic Treatment Potts Claim With the availability of VAE, there would be less interest in developing cures, treatments, and palliative measures. Analysis Is this a plausible claim? If VAE were available would we no longer want to find a cure for cancer or AIDs? Would we no longer care whether pain and suffering can be reduced or prevented? In Oregon, where physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is legal, a study reported that physicians undertook efforts to improve their knowledge and skills in relation to pain control. Second Reason: Abandonment of Hope Potts Claim Physicians diagnoses and prognoses are sometimes mistaken Patients diagnosed with a fatal disease do not have a fatal disease....
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

March+1 - Current Moral Problems Lecture March 1 Should...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online