1 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: LUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR Tukey's Test Graph Area AB AC AD Tukey's Multiple Range Test A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B C D E Counter 1­lb 1.12 1.12 1.06 1.14 1.10 1.11 1.06 1.16 1.13 1.07 1.12 1.06 Orignal Data 2­lb 2.08 2.10 2.08 2.09 2.11 1.97 2.05 2.07 2.13 2.10 2.05 2.05 3­lb 3.03 3.07 2.99 3.01 2.99 3.06 3.08 3.03 2.99 2.97 2.98 3.00 Counter 1 3 5 6 GROCERY SCALES 1 3 5 6 F G H Normalized Data 1­lb 2­lb 3­lb 1.12 1.04 1.01 1.12 1.06 1.14 1.10 1.11 1.06 1.16 1.13 1.07 1.12 1.06 A local grocery store was being investigated by the FTC for using incorrect scales for weighing produce at the checkout counter. Using standardized stainless steel weights, the FTC investigated four scales that consistently recorded high values. Each scale had the 1, 2 and 3-pound weights put on them in order and the values recorded and then this procedure was repeated two more times. Thus there are nine data points per scale. I J Counter 1­lb 1.12 1.12 1.06 1 3 1.14 1.10 1.11 5 1.06 1.16 1.13 6 1.07 1.12 1.06 K L Ready for c­reps 2­lb 3­lb 1.04 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M N A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 α 5.0% # Classes 10 Count 0 C D E F G H I J K Std Dev Uniform Normal Exponential Expected Observed # Classes 10 GOODNESS OF FIT TEST: UNIFORM, NORMAL, EXPONENTIAL Mean Median Mode Observed Min Max Range Observed Really need 5 or more observations per class; results may be misleading Calc χ2 Test χ2 Calc χ2 Test χ2 p(uniform) p(normal) 16.92 15.51 Skew Kurtosis p(exponential) Calc χ2 L M N O PRTVXAA QSU YAB WZ Click Link below to see Video Goodness of Fit Test Test χ2 16.92 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 4 # # # # 6 # # # 8 # # 12 10 # # # # 2 # 0 DATA # # # # # # # # # ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # # # # A B C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Source of Variation Between Row Name Between Interaction Error Total SS df D E F Two­way ANOVA ­ c replications MS Enter Title Here Calc F Test F Row Name Cell Averages G p Average H I α J Conclusion: 5.0% Averages suspiciously close Averages suspiciously close Averages suspiciously close Total Standard Deviation 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 0 $6.00 $4.00 0 Row 12 Row 13 Row 14 Row 15 $2.00 $0.00 $12.00 0 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 09/15/2013.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online