1 onesampleztestsign entertitlehere r s t u v click

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ## ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 B Riverside Pollution Breakdown Nitrate 41% Organic carbon 18% Ammonium 17% Sulfate 9% Elemental Carbon 8% Other 7% Riverside '90 210 '91 177 '92 125 '93 227 '94 155 '95 218 '96 156 '97 157 '98 112 C D E South Coast Air Quality F G Fine particulates have fouled the Los Angeles Basin's air for decades, especially in the Riverside area. The second table shows peak concentrations per year for 1990­98, measured in micrograms of particles per cubic meter of air and a breakdown of those particulates. Central LA 151 150 135 103 122 137 135 104 82 The LA Times chart stated that Riverside was much worse than Central Los Angeles. The chart also gave the breakdown of pollution in the first chart. What if Riverside in '92 measured only 25; how does that change the results in t1 and Sign template? Which do you trust more and why? Los Angeles Times, June 6, 2000, page A16. H A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q 1 One sample z­test (Sign) Enter Title Here R S T U V Click Link below to see video 2 nonparametric paired test 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 π Population 50.000% sample p σ n 50.000% 0 standard error p­π sample + 0 Calc z α Significance Tails 2 5.0% +/­Test z 1.960 + 0 ­ 0 Skew Kurtosis Difference z= Lower Both Upper Both Acce pt Ho π(1 −π) n Mean ### p −π H0: π H1: π = ≠ +/­ Diff Reject Ho INSTRUCTIONS A6: Enter assumed po...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 09/15/2013.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online