{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

# We 2 the non negativity constraints2 x y good to zero

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: onsumer a Px . These non-negativity into cases where the be in force, but like to not written P y run explicitly. We 2. the non-negativity constraints2 ; x, y good to zero. negative amount of a good. Whenever this happens, we simply set her consumption of that 3.1 Interior Optimum 0 Most of the time we will have an interior optimum : the consumer’s optimal bundle is positive in all goods. Figure 4 shows an interior optimum. At an interior optimum, an indi↵erence curve will be tangent to the budget line. This means that, at the optimal bundle, the slope of the budget line ( PX ) will be equal to the slope of the indi↵erence curve PY ( M RSXY ): PX = M RSXY . (1) PY Most of the time we will have an interior optimum: the consumer’s optimal bundle is positive in all goods. This expression has very strong economic intuition. The ratio of prices is the rate at which If the indifference curve is differentiable, it will befor good Y in theto the budget line at an interior optimum. Figure the consumer can exchange good X tangent market place. The marginal rate of and Y is the consumer would to 3 illustrates an interior optimum. substitution between Xthe optimal the rateisat whichfor which the consumerbeis willing to exchange X for Y . Thus, bundle the one willing exchange X for Y at precisely the rate the market is willing to exchange X for Y . ! "#\$%\$#\$&'\$()*#\$'+*,& 7 -.+*/01('2,*'\$(3*&+\$#*,#(4,15+*,&6 89 :; = < !" Figure 4: An interior optimum. Figure 3: An Interior Optimum It is important that you understand why this must be the case. Consider the following 1 We assume that the goods market is competitive so that the consumer takes the prices as given. 5 non-negativity constraints will always be in force, but usually not written explicitly. We will seldom run into cases where the consumer would like to consumer a negative amount of a good. 2 These 3 x At the interior optimum, the slope of the budget line Py will be equal to the slope of the indifference P curve, the negative marginal rate of substitution M RSxy : this means Px = MRSxy Py (6) This has a strong economic intuition. The ratio of prices is the rate at which the consumer can exchange good x for good y in the market place. The marginal rate of substitution between x and y is the “subjective rate” at which the consumer would be willing to exchange x for y. The optimal bundle is the one for which the consumer is willing to exchange x for y at precisely the rate the market is willing to exchange x for y. Example 1: Cobb-Douglas example. Let U be Y ) case, I = consider 50 following example with a Cobb-Douglas utility To understand why this must (X, the= XY , let’s 1000, PX =the and PY = 200. Are either of the two baskets optimal: (A) (X, Y ) = (4, 4) or (B) (X, P) I (10, ( 5)? Note that ). price ratio 4 function U ( x, y) = xy and the exogenous variables ( Px , Y y ,= ) = 2.50, 200, 1000theIn Figure is below, are either 1 Y . Since x, are dealing with B)...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online