{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

machiavelli and shakespeare

machiavelli and shakespeare - Flynn 1 Shellbe Flynn...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Flynn Shellbe Flynn Professor Irby Western Heritage in a Global Context 14 February 2007 A Speculation on Machiavelli’s Views of Brutus and Julius Caesar as Leaders Machiavelli’s The Prince was written as a guide to princes; a “how to book” if you will . He laid down ground rules on everything from what do to when you acquire a new princedom, to who to keep as friends and allies . He had strong stances on human nature, free will, and ethics . In his book you will find reference to any problem a prince could encounter . William Shakespeare, on the other hand, wrote Julius Caesar as a play to entertain the people of England . Though his characters are believable and concrete, they act in ways that real people can’t . His play is full of suicide, murder, and bloodbaths (and lengthy monologues in fancy dialect) . He writes of two major rulers, leaders, “princes” you could call them . Julius Caesar is the rising king of Rome; he has just defeated the pervious leader (of the Republic) and is seeking to make the city-state an Empire . His closest confidant turned cold-blooded murderer is Brutus . Brutus kills Caesar along with a band of conspirators because they believe that Caesar is gaining too much power and control too quickly .
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}