This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: erceptual problem solving
7. Abhorrence of coincidence/generic viewpoint
8. Repetition, rhythm, and orderliness
10. Metaphor duce an image that looks even more like Nixon than Nixon
himself. Skilled artists work this way to produce great portraiture;2 take it a step further and you get caricature. It looks
comical, but it still looks even more like Nixon than the original Nixon. So you’re behaving exactly like that rat.
What has all this to do with the rest of art? Let’s go back to
the Chola bronze of Parvathi, where the same principle applies. How does the artist convey the very epitome of feminine
sensuality? He simply takes the average female form and subtracts the average male form—leaving big breasts, big hips, and
a narrow waist. And then amplifies the difference. The result is
one anatomically incorrect but very sexy goddess.
But that’s not all there is to it—what about dignity, poise,
173 the internet and the university Here the Chola bronze artist has done something quite
clever. There are some postures that are impossible for a male
owing to the constraints imposed by pelvic anatomy, curvature
of the lumbar spine, and angle between the neck and shaft of
the femur. I can’t stand like that even if I want to. But a woman
can do it effortlessly. So the artist visits an abstract space I call
“posture space,” subtracts the average male posture from the
average female posture, and then exaggerates it. Doing this
produces the elegant triple flexion—or tribhanga—pose, where
the head is tilted one way, the body is tilted exactly the opposite
way, and the hips again the other way. And again the viewer’s
reaction is not that the figure is anatomically inappropriate because nobody can stand like that. What the viewer sees is a gorgeous, beautiful, celestial goddess. This extremely evocative
image is an example of the peak shift principle in Indian art.
So much for faces and caricatures and bodies and Chola
bronzes. But what about the rest of art? What about abstract
art, semi-abstract art, Impressionism, Cubism? What about Picasso, Van Gogh, Monet, Henry Moore? How can many ideas
even begin to explain the appeal of some of those artistic
To answer this question, we need to look at evidence from
ethology, especially the work of Niko Tinbergen at Oxford
more than fifty years ago, who was doing some very elegant experiments on herring-gull chicks.
As soon as the herring-gull chick hatches, it sees its mother’s
long yellow beak with a red spot on it. It starts pecking at the
red spot on the beak, begging for food. The mother then regur174 the artful brain gitates half-digested food into the chick’s gaping mouth, the
chick swallows the food and is happy. Tinbergen asked himself,
“How does the chick recognize its mother? Why doesn’t it beg
for food from a person who is passing by or from a pig?”
And he found that you don’t need a mother. A hatchling
would react in exactly the same way...
View Full Document
This document was uploaded on 09/24/2013.
- Summer '09