Ramachandran_Artful_Brain

Partly also because of just plain ignorance they

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: lso because of just plain ignorance. They complained that the breasts were far too big, the hips were too wide, and the waist was too narrow. It didn’t look anything like a real woman—it wasn’t realistic—it was primitive art. And they said the same thing about the voluptuous nymphs of Kajuraho—even about Rajastani and Mogul miniature paintings. They said the paintings lacked perspective, that they were distorted. The Victorians were unconsciously judging Indian art using the standards of Western art—especially classical Greek and Renaissance art, where realism is strongly emphasized. But obviously this is a fallacy. Anyone will tell you that art has nothing to do with realism. It is not about creating a replica of what’s out there in the world. I can take a realistic photograph of my pet cat and no one would give me a penny for it. In fact, art is not about realism at all—it’s the exact opposite. It involves deliberate hyperbole, exaggeration, even distortion, in order to create pleasing effects in the brain. Obviously that can’t be the whole story. You can’t just take an image and randomly distort it and call it art. (Although in California, where I come from, many do!) The distortion has to 171 the internet and the university be “lawful.” The question then becomes, what kinds of distortion are effective? What are the laws? I was sitting in a temple in India and in a whimsical frame of mind when I just jotted down what I think of as the universal laws of art, the 10 laws of art that cut across cultural boundaries (see the sidebar).1 The choice of 10 is arbitrary . . . but it’s a place to start. The first law I call peak shift. To illustrate this, I’ll use a hypothetical example from animal behavior, from rat psychology. Imagine you’re training a rat to discriminate a square from a rectangle by giving it a piece of cheese every time it sees a particular rectangle. When it sees a square, it receives nothing. Very soon it learns that the rectangle means food; it starts liking the rectangle—although a behaviorist wouldn’t put it that way. Let’s just say it starts going toward the rectangle because it prefers the rectangle to the square. But if you take a longer, thinner rectangle and show it to the rat, it actually prefers the second rectangle to the first. This is because the rat is learning a rule—rectangularity. Longer and thinner equals more rectangular and, so far as the rat is concerned, the more rectangular, the better. And what has that to do with art? Think about caricature. To produce a caricature of, say, Richard Nixon, an artist must first ask, What’s special about his face? What makes him different from other people? The artist will take the mathematical average, so to speak, of all male faces and subtract it from Nixon’s face, leaving a bulbous nose and shaggy eyebrows. These are then amplified to pro172 the artful brain Universal Laws of Art 1. Peak shift 2. Grouping 3. Contrast 4. Isolation 5. P...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 09/24/2013.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online