And mcinnes 1993 are useful to illustrate the most

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: le laser and target technology. The equation of motion for a moving target (sail) in the laboratory frame can be obtained with the help of a Lorentz transformation, similarly to Eq. (28). Neglecting absorption for simplicity (A ¼ 0) we obtain d 2I ðtret Þ 1À ð Þ ¼ ; Rð!0 Þ dt 1þ c2 dX ¼ c; dt (31) where X is the position of the sail, ¼ V=c is its velocity in units of c, ¼ ð1 À 2 ÞÀ1=2 ,  ¼ mi ni ‘ is the mass density per unit surface, and !0 ¼ !½ð1 À Þ=ð1 þ ފ1=2 is the EM wave (laser) frequency in the rest (sail) frame. Note that the intensity I is in general a function of the retarded time tret ¼ t À X=c. Analytical solutions to Eqs. (31) exist depending on suitable expressions for Rð!Þ, the simplest case being Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 85, No. 2, April–June 2013 775 that of a perfectly reflecting mirror (R ¼ 1) and a pulse of constant intensity I (Simmons and McInnes, 1993).20 The factor as a function of time is given by ðtÞ ¼ sinhðuÞ þ 1 ; 4sinhðuÞ 1 u  asinhð3t þ 2Þ; (32) 3 where   ðZme a2 =Amp  Þ! and  has been defined in 0 Eq. (5). Asymptotically, ðtÞ ’ ð3tÞ1=3 [see Fig. 25(a)]. The most significant quantities can be obtained for an arbitrary pulse shape I ðtÞ as a function of the dimensionless pulse fluence F (the pulse energy per unit surface): 2 Z tret 0 0 I ðt Þdt : (33) F ðtret Þ ¼ 2 c 0 The sail velocity , the corresponding energy per nucleon E ¼ mp c2 ð À 1Þ, and the instantaneous efficiency  (i.e., the ratio between the mechanical energy delivered to the sail and the incident pulse energy)21 are given by ðtret Þ ¼ ½1 þ F ðtret ފ2 À 1 ; ½1 þ F ðtret ފ2 þ 1 E ðtret Þ ¼ mp c2 ðtret Þ ¼ F 2 ðtret Þ ; 2½F ðtret Þ þ 1Š 2 ðtret Þ 1 ¼1À : 1 þ ðtret Þ ½F ðtret Þ þ 1Š2 (34) (35) (36) Thus,  ! 1 when ðtret Þ ! 1. The final energy per nucleon E max is obtained from the total fluence F 1 ¼ F ðtret ¼ 1Þ. For a constant intensity F 1 ¼ p , where p is the duration of the laser pulse. In practical units F 1 ¼ 2:2F1e8 À1 ‘À1 , 1 10 where F1e8 is the fluence in units of 108 J cmÀ2 , 1 ¼ mi ni =1 g cmÀ3 , and ‘10 ¼ ‘=10 nm. The scalings for E max are summarized in Fig. 25(b). With present-day or near-term laser technology, fluence values of 108 J cmÀ3 seem affordable, while target manufacturing can produce films of a few nm thickness, e.g., diamondlike carbon (DLC) foils. These values yield F 1 > 1 allowing one to approach a regime of high efficiency, relativistic ions, and favorable scaling with the pulse energy. The above estimates have been obtained assuming a perfectly reflecting sail (R ¼ 1) that, for a given surface density parameter  , limits the laser amplitude to a0 <  due to the onset of relativistic transparency [Eq. (5)] that reduces the boost on the foil. This effect suggests a0 ¼  as an ‘‘optimal’’ condition for LS acceleration (Macchi, Veghini, and Pegoraro, 2009; Tr...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 09/28/2013.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online