Consumption then increases byon consumption tis

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: increases disposable income changes by dollar. Consumption then increases byon consumption tis smaller.G. Expenditure and income less than total income, so the effect an amount (1 – )MPC × Δ When taxes are fixed, we know that ∆Y/∆G = 1/(1 – MPC). We found this by increase even more. The process increase by this amount, which in turn causes consumption to considering an increase in government purchases of ∆G; the initial effect of this continues, and the total change in output is change is to increase income by ∆G. This in turn increases consumption by an amount equal to the marginal propensity to consume times the change in 3 income, ΔY = ΔG {1 + (1 – t)MPC + [(1 – t)MPC]2 + [(1 – t)MPC] + ....} MPC × ∆G. This increase in consumption raises expenditure and income even further. The process continues indefinitely, and we derive the multiplier above. = ΔG [1/(1 – (1 – t)MPC)]. When taxes depend on income, we know that the increase of ∆G increases total income by ∆G; disposable income, however, increases by only (1 – t)∆G—less Thus, Consumption then increases by an amount (1 t ) than dollar for dollar.the government-purchases multiplier becomes 1/(1 – (1 ––t)MPC) rather than 1/(1 – MPC). This means a much smaller by this amount, which in turn causMPC × ∆G. Expenditure and income increasemultiplier. For example, if the marginal propensity to consume MPC i 3/4 and the tax more. 1/3, process continues, and the total es consumption tos increase even rate t is The then the multiplier falls from 1/(1 – 3/4), or 4, to 1/(1 – (1 – change in output is1/3)(3/4)), or 2. ∆Y = ∆G {1 + (1 – t)MPC + [(1 – t)MPC]2 + [(1 – t)MPC]3 + ....} c. In this chapter, we derived the IS curve algebraically and used it to gain insight into the = ∆G [1/(1 – (1 – t)MPC)]. interest rate and output. To determine how this tax system alters the relationship between the slope of the IS curve, we can derive the IS – (1 – t MPC) in which taxes depend on income. Thus, the government-purchases multiplier becomes 1/(1curve for )the caserather Begin with a national income accounts For example, if the marthan 1/(1 – MPC). This meansthemuch smaller multiplier. identity: ginal propensity to consume MPC is 3/4 and the tax rate t is 1/3, then the multiplier falls from 1/(1 – Y = C +4, + G. – (1 – 1/3)(3/4)), or 2. 3/4), or I to 1/(1 In this chapter, we derived the IS curve algebraically and used it to gain insight into the relationshiphe consumption function is and output. To determine how this T between the interest rate tax system alters the slope of the IS curve, we can derive the IS curve for the case in which taxes depend a + income. Begin with the national income accounts identiC = on b(Y – T – tY). ty: Note that in this Y = C + I + Gfunction taxes are a function of income. The investment function is consumption . the sameis in the chapter: as The consumption function C = a + b(Y – T – tY). Note that in this consumption function taxes are a function of income. The investment function is theubstitute the the chapter: and investment functions into the national income accounts identity to S same as in consumption I = c – dr. obtain: I = c – d r. Substitute the consumption and investment functions into the national income Y = [a + accounts identity to obtain: b(Y – T – tY)] + c – dr + G. Yolving for r: T – tY)] + c – dr + G. S = [a + b(Y – Solving for r: r= È b (1 - t ) - 1 ˘ a - bT + c + G +Y Í ˙. d d Î ˚ Chapter 10 Aggregate Demand I 93 The slope of the IS curve is therefore: pe of the IS curve is therefore: Dr b (1 - t ) - 1 = . Dy d that t is a number that is less than 1. As t becomes a bigger number, the Recall in absolute value than 1. As increases, becomes f the IS curve increases that t and b are less terms andt the curve the slope of the IS curve increases in absolute value terms is 0.80, t is 0.1, and d steeper. Suppose, for example, that b is 0.80, t is 0.1, and d is . Suppose, for example, that b and the curve becomes is 0.5. The slope of the 0.5. The increases to 0.2, then the slope becomes –0.72. e is –0.56. If the tax rate slope of the IS curve is –0.56. If the tax rate increases to 0.2, then the slope becomes – ely, if the tax rate 0.72. Intuitively, any givenrate is higher, then interest rate is higher, then if the tax reduction in the any given reduction in the intere...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/01/2013 for the course ECON 302 taught by Professor Alvero during the Winter '09 term at The University of British Columbia.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online