The Nature in Natural Law.pdf - Liberty University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 8 March 2008 The Nature in Natural Law Donald R McConnell Follow

The Nature in Natural Law.pdf - Liberty University Law...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 51 pages.

Liberty University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 8 March 2008 The Nature in Natural Law The Nature in Natural Law Donald R. McConnell Follow this and additional works at: Recommended Citation Recommended Citation McConnell, Donald R. (2008) "The Nature in Natural Law," Liberty University Law Review : Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 , Article 8. Available at: This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected] .
THE NATURE IN NATURAL LAW Donald R. McConnell Abstract In the Tolkien classic and recent motion picture epic The Lord of the Rings there is a compelling portrayal of the struggle between good and evil as it is manifested between empires, cultures, peoples, and in the hearts of individuals. It is a portrayal that resonates deeply in the human heart. It reveals something of what we know at a deep level. One could say it speaks indirectly of the Natural Law. Why do we call Natural Law "Natural"? If Natural Law is natural because it comes from the nature of human beings, as Finnis, and many other contemporary Natural Law advocates appear to say, then why are there not different rules for different natures? No one partaking of the mythic struggle for Middle Earth would say that murder, torture and oppression of others are right for Sauron and the orcs because theyflowfrom their nature. Indeed, if as Francis Fukuyama fears human nature can be changed, just as the dark powers turned captive elves into orcs in Tolkien 'spast of legend, why would there not be some other morality flowing from that new nature. The Natural Law must have something to do with a more fixed and transcendent nature. Looking at the ancient stoics we can see that at the dawning of systematic thought about Natural Law they had an insight into why they called this objective law above human law "natural. " When the stoic's aberrant pantheism is sorted out, we can see that the real nature of Natural Law is God's nature. An examination of the other historical views of what is meant by nature in regard to Natural Law discloses that all of the theories borrow one or more of the strands unifying view ofNatural Law held by the stoics. No one of the views, except perhaps Augustine of Hippo, directly links the nature of God with the use of nature in the descriptive phrase "Natural Law." But many of the historic views are not far from, or incompatible with focusing on God's nature and primary. There are some disadvantages to the historic natures used in various theories. There are practical and Biblical reasons why it makes sense to re-adopt the view that the relevant nature ofNatural Law is the nature of God himself t Academic Dean of Trinity Law School and assistant professor of Law. J.D., University of

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture