Lecture Notes 11 14 07 [PHIL 140]

Lecture Notes 11 14 07 [PHIL 140] - PHIL 140g 11/14/07 Rape...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: PHIL 140g 11/14/07 Rape A) Soble- 3 objections to Antioch B) Kittay- Contracts vs. Gifts Reminder: Class on Monday, no class Wed. Defining rape requires def consent Def consent requires def coercion Def coercion requires def threat Def threat requires def reasonable Def reasonable requires def conception of what pressures are permissible to place A) Antioch Policy : The only kinds of pressures that are permissible to place on another to agree to sex are those involved in asking verbally and explicitly for consent. Sobles criticisms: 1) Policy fails to respect autonomy of women On (1) : No means no. Its morally impermissible to treat a no as anything other than that in sexual contexts. Why? To do otherwise is to violate the following principle:- Morality requires us to assure that others are acting autonomously- Autonomous action= Action that 1. Accords with her conception of what is best to do and 2. Where shes un-hesitant about what is best to do Why would you think that no doesnt mean no?Why would you think that no doesnt mean no?...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

Lecture Notes 11 14 07 [PHIL 140] - PHIL 140g 11/14/07 Rape...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online