Appeasement DA 2 - Michigan7 2013


Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: lions, federations concerned about ¶ possible regional tax revolts, and monopolists eager to deter entry.¶ Below, I demonstrate this point formally. First I present a benchmark model of ¶ the interaction between one "central" and two "local" actors assuming no resource¶ constraint, and I show how investing in reputation can be rational (and appeasement ¶ irrational) a la Kreps and Wilson and Milgrom and Roberts. I show that a¶ deterrence equilibrium will often exist in which "weak" central actors fight to preserve¶ a reputation for "strength." I then show how the logic changes if the central ¶ actor's resources are limited. Now APPEASEMENT DISADVANTAGE 7-WEEK JUNIORS MICHIGAN 2013 CFJPV ighting the first challenger to demonstrate resolve f ¶ is often self­destructive: it weakens the center so much that this actually ¶ prompts the second to attack. The conditions for this depend on whether the stakes ¶ of conflict can be manipulated by the center or are exogenous. If they are exogenous,¶ fighting is self­destructive when the stakes are either high or low; if endogenous, ¶...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online