Appeasement DA 2 - Michigan7 2013


Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ¶ threats—to justify decisions for war and military intervention ; some ¶ presidents have compared enemy leaders to Hitler. The underlying ¶ assumption of the so­called Munich analogy is that the democracies ¶ could and should have stopped Hitler (thereby avoiding World War ¶ II and the Holocaust) by moving against him militarily before 1939. ¶ This assumption, however, is easy to make only in hindsight and ¶ ignores the political, military, economic, and psychological contexts of ¶ Anglo­French security choices during the 1930s. Among the myriad ¶ factors constraining those choices were memories of the horrors ¶ of World War I, failure to grasp the nature of the Nazi regime and ¶ Hitler’s strategic ambitions, France’s military inflexibility, Britain’s ¶ strategic overstretch, France’s strategic dependence on Britain, guilt ¶ over the Versailles Treaty of 1919, dread of strategic bombing and ¶ misjudgment of the Nazi air threat, American isolationism, and ¶ distrust...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/27/2013 for the course DEBATE 101 taught by Professor None during the Summer '12 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online