Appeasement DA 2 - Michigan7 2013

Theywillreplacethe

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Qaeda to believe that it could strike the United States with impunity ? Does a reputation for resolve keep a country safer? Experienced practitioners and scholars of foreign policy take for granted the notion that actions taken during crises today can affect (and perhaps prevent) the crises of tomorrow . This belief is so wide­spread and well­established that to suggest it is wrong would seem terribly naïve, perhaps even dangerous. But indeed it is wrong – states cannot control the perceptions of others, suggesting that a deep concern with credibility and reputation is misguided. An “eye toward the future,” although understandable and even comforting, often creates profound myopia toward the events of the present. This paper is a re­examination of the credibility imperative as an independent variable in explaining state behavior. It will primarily discuss U.S. foreign policy, because for reasons anchored either in the nature of great power or the American cultural consciousness, the United States seems to exhibit a concern for credibility that is more intense than that of other states. The first section discusses the concept, speculating about its origins, underlying assumpt...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/27/2013 for the course DEBATE 101 taught by Professor None during the Summer '12 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online