Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: resumably usco’s capital investment in Canco is not funded with usco’s surplus funds; nevertheless, the Cra did not raise a concern about the source of usco’s funding. Logically, the Cra should take the same view on interest and other types of income. because Canco’s operations are 99 times larger than those of the us affiliated group, us Opco may not meet the substantiality test in the third condition, even if Canada takes the position that the test is an anti-avoidance provision, rather than a bright-line test. However, interpretive issues are sure to arise until Canadian tax authorities provide further guidance. derIvaTIve BeNefITs TesT if the qualifying person tests are not met and the exception under the active trade or business test is not met, a further exception in article xxix a(4), referred to as the derivative benefits test, may give a taxpayer access to certain treaty benefits. article xxix a(4) provides treaty relief that is limited to dividends, interest, and royalties 46 s...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/03/2013 for the course ACCOUNTING 346 taught by Professor William during the Fall '12 term at DeVry Chicago.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online