Fasb argument is that stock option plans are a form

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: t of stock options. They claim that stock options are not really an expense since they are not transferring actual cash. FASB argument is that stock option plans are a form of compensation, as there is value being transferred, even if it is not cash (www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-column-nettr). D espite F ASB’s view that expensing stock options would improve the financial reporting, it did not drastically change the rules when it issued SFAS 123. While under SFAS 123 it is preferable to expense stock options, using a fair-value based method, companies have a choice of not doing so (Dakdduk, 1996). Another issue raised with regard to stock options is: How are options valued and when are they expensed? Economists mostly agree that stock options should be expensed using a fair-value method, which reflects what the options would cost to buy in the market if they were available. Two other methods, such as the intrinsic value and the minimum value method, are ruled out by both economists and IASB. FASB is also inclined to applying a fair-value method (The Economist, November 2002, Vol. 365, Issue 8298). However, FASB provides companies with the option of how to measure stock option plans. FASB believes that having multiple choices will actually encourage companies to expense them (www.online.wsj.com/article_print). The issue of when to expense options raised additional disagreements. IASB wants the expense to be recognised at a date when an option is awarded to employees, i.e. grant date. But some economists believe options should be expensed when they are exercised, i.e. when the options holder trades it for the underlying shares. Under this approach, options would still be expensed at a grant date, but subsequently the estimated value would be adjusted to take into account the changes in value. Upon exercise of the option, the company would have to take 11 any gain or loss in order to match the option’s actual value when exercised. It would diminish the incentive to manipulate option values since any difference from the option’s final true value results in additional charges to a company (The Economist, November 2002, Vol. 365, Issue 8298). The above discussion can be summarised into three major questions: • Should companies expense stock options? • How should stock options be valued? • Is granting an option a once-only expense for companies or is it a contingent liability, the potential cost of which changes with fluctuations in market price of companies’ shares and the final cost of which becomes clear when options are exercised or expire? The standard-setting bodies, IASB and FASB in this thesis, and the companies have different answers with regard to these questions. We will look deeper into what issues bring up the most controversy and what are the commonly provided answers when it comes to implementing the accounting for stock options in practice. 1.3 Research Issue The question we are going to answer in our thesis is: • What is the opinion of the business community on the issue of expensing stock-based compensation plans and what arguments are presented pro/con? 1.4 Purpose The purpose of this thesis consists of four parts: • Describe existing and proposed rules, namely: “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123; “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,” Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148; “Share-Based Payment,” Exposure Draft International Financial Reporting Standard; 12 Invitation to Comment “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation: A C omparison o f F ASB S tatement No.123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Its Related Interpretations, and IASB Proposed IFRS Share-Based Payment.” • Make comparisons of existing and proposed rules for accounting for stock options to how companies account for stock options in practice. • Make an analysis of a selected range of Comment Letters submitted by various companies in order to identify the main issues discussed by these companies and their views regarding the treatment of stock option plans in financial statements. • Present conclusions on the basis of the analysis. - 1.5 Delimitations Mainly due to the lack of time, some limitations of scope are set for this thesis. The main existing and proposed rules regarding accounting for stock options have been selected. However, one of the proposed rules is an Exposure Draft and one is an Invitation to Comment. The periods over which Comment Letters can be submitted on this Exposure Draft and Invitation to Comment are not over yet. Therefore the final version of the standards might differ from the proposed ones. However, we do not have enough time to wait until these proposed rules become standards and will have to draw some of our conclusions on the basis of the Exposure Draft. As it was not feasible to study all submitted Comment Letters, we selected a number of Comment Letters submitted by companies with regard to the existing and proposed FASB...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 10/31/2013.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online