February+1

February+1 - Current Moral Problems Lecture February 1 A...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Current Moral Problems Lecture February 1 A Defense of Speciesism Carl Cohen: The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research Cohen Critiques two Arguments Against Using Non-human Animals for Research A rights argument (e.g., Regan) Research is ethically wrong insofar as it violates the rights of non-human animals. A utilitarian argument (e.g., Singer) Research is ethically wrong insofar as it causes non-human animals to experience pain, discomfort, etc. Cohens Critique of the Rights Argument Research cannot violate the rights of non-human animals because they do not have any rights. Cohens Analysis of Rights Rights are moral claims : Rights are claims, or potential claims, within a community of moral agents (SE, p. 504). The capacity to make moral claims is a necessary condition of possessing rights: Rights arise, and can be intelligibly defended, only among beings who actually do, or can,...
View Full Document

Page1 / 3

February+1 - Current Moral Problems Lecture February 1 A...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online