This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Current Moral Problems Lecture February 1 A Defense of Speciesism Carl Cohen: The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research Cohen Critiques two Arguments Against Using Non-human Animals for Research A rights argument (e.g., Regan) Research is ethically wrong insofar as it violates the rights of non-human animals. A utilitarian argument (e.g., Singer) Research is ethically wrong insofar as it causes non-human animals to experience pain, discomfort, etc. Cohens Critique of the Rights Argument Research cannot violate the rights of non-human animals because they do not have any rights. Cohens Analysis of Rights Rights are moral claims : Rights are claims, or potential claims, within a community of moral agents (SE, p. 504). The capacity to make moral claims is a necessary condition of possessing rights: Rights arise, and can be intelligibly defended, only among beings who actually do, or can,...
View Full Document
- Fall '08