{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

comparaison SF36 NHP - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Bio Med Central Page 1 of 11 (page number not for citation purposes) Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Open Access Research A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia in a longitudinal perspective Christine Wann-Hansson* 1 , Ingalill Rahm Hallberg 1,2 , Bo Risberg 3 and Rosemarie Klevsgård 1 Address: 1 Department of Nursing Science Lund University, Sweden, 2 The Vårdal Institute, The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Sweden and 3 Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden Email: Christine Wann-Hansson* - [email protected]; Ingalill Rahm Hallberg - [email protected]; Bo Risberg - [email protected]; Rosemarie Klevsgård - [email protected] * Corresponding author Lower limb ischaemiaNottingham Health ProfileReliabilityResponsivenessShort Form 36Validity Abstract Background: Different generic quality of life instruments such as the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) have revealed conflicting results in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia in psychometric attributes in short-term evaluations. The aim of this study was to compare the NHP and the SF-36 regarding internal consistency reliability, validity, responsiveness and suitability as outcome measures in patients with lower limb ischaemia in a longitudinal perspective. Methods: 48 patients with intermittent claudication and 42 with critical ischaemia were included. Assessment was made before and one year after revascularization using comparable domains of the NHP and the SF-36 questionnaires. Results: The SF-36 was less skewed and more homogeneous than the NHP. There was an average convergent validity in three of the five comparable domains one year postoperatively. The SF-36 showed a higher internal consistency except for social functioning one-year postoperatively and was more responsive in detecting changes over time in patients with intermittent claudication. The NHP was more sensitive in discriminating among levels of ischaemia regarding pain and more able to detect changes in the critical ischaemia group. Conclusion: Both SF-36 and NHP have acceptable degrees of reliability for group-level comparisons, convergent and construct validity one year postoperatively. Nevertheless, the SF-36 has superior psychometric properties and was more suitable in patients with intermittent claudication. The NHP however, discriminated better among severity of ischaemia and was more responsive in patients with critical ischaemia. Published: 17 February 2004 Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004, 2 :9 Received: 14 October 2003 Accepted: 17 February 2004 This article is available from: http://www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/9 © 2004 Wann-Hansson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern