{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

32 journal of economic perspectives supply supply

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: eaudry and Lahiri (2010), though the former authors prefer to interpret the constraint as one on value at risk. 32 Journal of Economic Perspectives supply supply schedule XS will be upward sloping, as shown in Figure 3B, if the acceptable able leverage ratio is higher when the spread between the expected return on the assets in which intermediaries can invest and the rate they must pay on their liabilities is greater. Consider, for example, a value-at-risk constraint, that requires the future value of the intermediary’s assets to be worth at least some fraction k of the amount owed on its debt, with at least some probability 1 – p; and suppose and that the risky asset in which the intermediary invests will pay at least a fraction s of its expected payoff with probability 1 – p. Then the value-at-risk constraint is satisfied if and only if the intermediary’s leverage ratio (debt as a fraction of the total ed value of its assets) is no greater than s/k times the factor (1 + i b)/(1 + i s)...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online