Only a daft fanatic could contemplate tossing a match

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ' responses to those changes seem to have been overblown. Multipolarity — an international system marked by three or more roughly equally matched major powers—did not return in the 1960s, 1970s, or early 1990s and each decline scare ended with the United States' position of primacy arguably strengthened. It is impossible to know for sure whether or not the scare is for real this time—shifts in the distribution of power are notoriously hard to forecast. Barring geopolitical upheavals on the scale of Soviet collapse, the inter-state scales of power tend to change slowly. The trick is to determine when subtle quantitative shifts will lead to a major qualitative transformation of the basic structure of the international system. Fortunately, there are some simple rules of power analysis that can help prevent wild fluctuations in response to current events. Unfortunately, arguments for multipolarity’s rapid return usually run afoul of them. A2: Impact Defense – Iran Conflict with Iran will cause a global nuclear firestorm Silver Donald Cameron (poli...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online