Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: no state can rationally make a commitment to visionary and expensive rail projects. It looks like the transportation of the future—like the energy of the future—will remain a dream in the minds of blue politicians and trendy urban planners for years to come.} Coordination and federal leadership are key to a national high speed rail Schwieterman, director of Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development at the University of DePaul in Chicago, Scheldt, Master’s Degree in Civil Engineering, 2007 (Joseph, Justin, Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics, and Policy), pg 435 [Several of our findings highlight notable issues facing governments that are proposing HSR systems: * More than 70 percent of the existing railroad mileage identified for HSR involves single-track lines with traffic densities exceeding 10 million gross ton-miles annually. On such routes, there are typically at least a dozen daily freight operations and often substantially more. The development of HSR service generally requires investments in capacity enhancements to eliminate conflicts and/or potential bottlenecks. * About 63 percent of all proposed HSR mileage involves corridors that cross state boundary lines. This finding both reinforces the not...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/30/2013 for the course PHILOSOPHY 303m taught by Professor Tye during the Fall '12 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online