Assignment 2 Solutions 2009

# We have 2n equatio ns the degrees of freedo m at this

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: so consider the velocit y u to be a variable as the throughput for the chromatography co lumn 0 may change. Also, k a , j , k d , j , q , j , e , e t , D L m This yields 5N+4 variables. We have 2N equatio ns. The degrees of freedo m at this point are: F = (5 + 4 - 2 N = 3 + 4 N ) N Can we come up with more relationships? Fo llowing assumpt ions are appropriate: · Void fract ions ( e , e t ) are constant. · Maximum adsorbate concentration q , j is a constant. m This yie lds N + 2 addit ional relat ionships. The adsorption and desorption rate constants can vary with t ime during the chromatographic process. They can also be related to the intrinsic adsorption/desorption rate constants (Lin et al., Ind. & Eng. Chem. Research, 1998). We will assume that they can be expressed as: k d , j = f ( d , j , q m , j , c , i ,.....) k 0 k a , j = f ( a , j , q , j , c , i ,.....) k m 0 This yields 2N more relationships. Finally, the dispersio n coefficient can be expressed as: d p u 0 = 0.2 + 0 011 e 0 . 48 . R D L In summary, we have F = (3 + 4 - ( N + 2 - 2 N - 1 = 1 N ) ) Thus, the degree of freedo m is one. c. The system is underdetermined because F = 1 > 0 . d. What we, as process control engineers, would do is to use a controller t...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 01/12/2014 for the course CHE 4198 taught by Professor Hjortso,m during the Fall '08 term at LSU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online