# Thus once again we need to nd the nontrivial

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Cole Publishing Company, 2000. 94 instant of time. We will assume that the potential energy in the string when it is in the conﬁguration u(x) is L T 2 V (u(x)) = 0 2 du dx dx, (4.17) where T is a constant, called the tension of the string. Indeed, we could imagine that we have devised an experiment that measures the potential energy in the string in various conﬁgurations, and has determined that (4.17) does indeed represent the total potential energy in the string. On the other hand, this expression for potential energy is quite plausible for the following reason: We could imagine ﬁrst that the amount of energy in the string should be proportional to the amount of stretching of the string, or in other words, proportional to the length of the string. From vector calculus, we know that the length of the curve u = u(x) is given by the formula L 1 + (du/dx)2 dx. Length = 0 But when du/dx is small, 1 1+ 2 du dx 22 du dx =1+ 2 + a small error, and hence 1 + (du/dx)2 1 is closely approximated by 1 + (du/dx)2 . 2 Thus to a ﬁrst order of approxim...
View Full Document

## This document was uploaded on 01/12/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online