Walmart Sustainability

4 getting started the next challenge was to figure

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: w.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentID=5300 (January 25, 2007). c All quotations from interviews conducted by authors unless otherwise cited. b Walmart’s Sustainability Strategy (A) OIT-71A p. 4 Getting Started The next challenge was to figure out where to focus. Over the next four to six months, Walmart worked with Blu Skye, Conservation International (CI) and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) to identify which of its products and processes created the greatest environmental impacts. The impact assessment leveraged data compiled by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) regarding environmental impacts in five primary areas (greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, water pollution, water use, and land use) across 134 product categories.19 For each of these product categories and impact areas, the UCS estimated an environmental impact score per $1 spent by a consumer (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions in tons of CO2 equivalents per $1 spent on electronics). Walmart then multiplied these environmental impact scores by 2003 sales in each product category to estimate the company’s overall environmental impact in each of the five areas. While the results were relatively rough, they provided managers with enough directional data to help them understand where the greatest problems existed and start thinking about pragmatic solutions. (See Exhibit 1 for the product categories with highest total environmental impact scores.) By June 2005, a team of top Walmart executives, high-potential employees, and the consultants had identified three primary areas around which it would set environmental goals for reducing Walmart’s impact on the environment: energy, waste, and products. In each area, “We recognized early on that we had to look at the entire value chain,” said Elm. “If we had focused on just our own operations, we would have limited ourselves to 10 percent of our effect on the environment and, quite frankly, eliminated 90 percent of the opportunity that's out there.” Next Ste...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/14/2014 for the course LGST 210 taught by Professor Sep during the Winter '10 term at UPenn.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online