05 d f 4 fishless 0001 fig and d predicted there

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: es a ighly significant f P < 0.001). 0.05) = 3.82, df = 1   High feeding rates streams ry uot significantly reduce i S feeding rate in response ish d n p!) S a • f s P < .001). A 1 there w = with f •  Low feeding rates without,13,cores=0mong xhelso, .013, SEere (s0ignificant tfodishidhemical cues,torfer hend tsih, 1998, EvoluOon 0.05)ifferences in tapish (n a 133, t =five populations.03; Fish d than f c while t two most isolated populations (F = 9.05, df = P < P < 0.001, F there were significant s did n h significantly reduce its feeding rate ate in r = 3.82, df = 1,13, 4,70, 0.001). Also,ig. 2). As predicted, there fishhowed ot ighly significant decreases in feedingin rresponseewas a mn tap scores among theegative correlation between to sponse to fish cchemicals (P <two most Fig. 3). The two most arginally significant n five populations with fish 0.001, isolated populations differences i fish chemical ues, while the i 9.05, d f = 4 fishless 0.001, Fig. and d predicted, there isolated populations with ish had s in (F =solation f rom,70, P &...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online