2 average opulation larvae from the five populations

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 00-~~ A h~ (and presumably subject to higher predation rates) in small C14 B AB 1.00- AC 12060z patches that received gene flow from larger patches (with A 0.75 el A 60z 100- A sticks that had the opposite color morph). In barA 0.75 el A walking nacles subject to00 igh thermal stress environments, Bertness 804h 4 0.50 - 40 and Gaines (1993)40showed an apparent lack of local adap0.50 60tation in a population with a lot of mixing among local hab> 0.25400.25itats. However, 2n20- population that had little mixing, there i 0- a 20 was better local adaptation, suggesting gene flow as a mech0.00 .00 0 anism that prevented local adaptation. In two insect-trans0 00 W TPTP RD CR R CD AM MWC C R RRD C M MCD A ocal Rdaptation MCD implicated aRD R was M plant studies, strong TlP P RRD CCR MCD AAM WCC when RRD T TP W CR MCD AM WC Population insects survived at a much higherPrate at natal sites as opposed Population opulation Population P tscores for flor from the five populations FIG. 2. Average opulation larvae from the five populations ap scores t transplanted s 1994; Mopper et al. FIG.with fAverage tapeach) and one isolated population withoutoish (n FIG.3. Mites (Hanks and Denno resence versus absence of 2. ish (n = 15 arvae aximum feeding rates in the p f fish n T= is...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online