82 df w13 p redators because popu significant o

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ish.means.ars in the graph are means +1al. E. 990;onrepresentrhe1993). Inpopulationn(the two treatments.Shown a S 1 bars Reeding t atesifference intfwo-population studies, differf differences between The b *fish chemicalmffectb(e confounded chemical Different letters above each bar indicate that there are significant bre ighly significant indicates a significant <ffect of fish by other ences aetween + 1 SE. hmeans population pairs e ay P e 0.001). populations withifferences between mhe longest (Fig. 4). These on feeding rates within a population (P < 0.05), *** indicates a d fish survived t eans. sources of variation rather than selective differences or gene 0 the predator-avoidance behaviors m SE results indicate that.05) than without fish (n = 133, x = 1.013, ea- = 0.03; F highly significant fish chemical effect (P < 0.001). flow. In fish did not tshe present reduce its nalyzed rateultiple popcontrast, ignificantly study a feeding m in response 0 lso, sured are related t= 3.82, df = w,13, P redators because popu- significant o sur...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/13/2014 for the course BIONB 2210 taught by Professor Seeley during the Fall '10 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online