Unformatted text preview: vival 1 ith p < = .001). A= there were
0.05)ifferences in tapish (n among xhe five populations.03; Fish tthat differed cn their level twof most isolated populations
d than without f scores 133, t
1.013, SE = 0 wulations o fish chemical iues, while the o genetic isolation.
lations that had=a3stronger 1,13, 4,70, 0.001). Also,ig.o2).ishereur(.82, df = df = P < P < esponse tt f As predicted, there fishhowed ot ighly significanttorfer and n ih, ate in rresponseeF = 9.05, behavioral r 0.001, F here w s significant
s did n h significantly rS decreases i S feeding atevoluOon educe its feeding r 1998, E in r
arginally s a weaker ive populations
vived longer than wopulations scores a mong theegative correlation between to sponse to fish cchemicals (tP <two.001, Fig. 3). The two most
p as a mn tap with ignificant n fbehavioral re-with fish
fish chemical ues, while he 0 most isolated populations
E significant S had s in feeding rate n reisolation f rom,70, P < populations 2). Aselay of response to showed highly volutionaryfdecreasesignificantly higher fieeding
f = 4 fishless 0.001, Fig. and d predicted, there
isolated populations with ishignificance
(F = 9.05, d
simulated attack (r, = -0.77, P = 0.07). The most isolated rate differences than the two least is...
View Full Document