Unformatted text preview: s. Fo r example, in Austria vo ting is co mpulso ry in o nly tw o regio ns,
w ith sanctio ns being w eakly enfo rced. Ho w ever, these regio ns tend to have a
higher turno ut average than the natio nal average.
Other po ssible reaso ns fo r no t enfo rcing the law s co uld be co mplexity and
reso urces required fo r enfo rcement. C o untries w ith limited budgets may no t
place the enfo rcement o f mandato ry vo ting law s as a high prio rity still they ho pe
that the presence o f the law w ill enco urage the citiz ens to participate.
C an a co untry be co nsidered to practice co mpulso ry vo ting if the mandato ry
vo ting law s are igno red and irrelevant to the vo ting habits o f the electo rate? Is a
co untry practicing co mpulso ry vo ting if there are no penalties fo r no t vo ting?
What if there are penalties fo r failing to vo te but they are never o r are scarcely
enfo rced? Or if the penalty is negligible?
Many co untries o ffer lo o pho les, intentio nally and o therw ise, w hich allo w no nvo ters to go unpunishe...
View Full Document
This document was uploaded on 01/16/2014.
- Winter '14