Commentary_ The Case for Compulsory Voting _ The National Interest

And while it was a s tep in the right direc tion the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: es ” option alongs ide the major parties . And while it was a s tep in the right direc tion, the initiative was nonbinding and toothles s . In the 1976 Republic an Congres s ional primary , “none of thes e c andidates ” trounc ed its c ompetitors , and y et, des pite the abjec tly c lear will of the voters , the nomination went to the neares t runner-up (who, perhaps uns urpris ingly , went on to los e to the Democ ratic inc umbent). For c ompuls ory voting to be viable, the public mus t be given a full c omplement of options . All s tates s hould pres ent voters with the option of nationalinter est.or g /commentar y/the- case- compulsor y- voting - 7691 1/2 8/30/13 Commentar y: The Case for Compulsor y Voting | The National Inter est “none of thes e c andidates ,” and s hould require the parties to field new c andidates in another round, s hould that be the will of the people. As of 2012, doz ens of nations on almos t every c ontinent employ a s y s tem of c ompuls ory voting. They inc lude democ ratic nations s uc h as Belgium, Lux embourg and Aus tralia. Aus tralia, it s hould be noted, has often been ahead of the c urve when it c omes to democ rac y . The c ountry was one of the firs t to adopt the now-ubiquitous s ec ret ballot in 1856, a full thirty y ears before it would bec ome c ommon in the United States . And for the his tory buffs , c ompuls ory voting has no...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/16/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online