Commentary_ The Case for Compulsory Voting _ The National Interest

But ultimately when two parties have a s tranglehold

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ing a $1000 limit on politic al donations by a s ingle pers on -- all thes e will help. But ultimately when two parties have a s tranglehold over the national dis c ours e, and no new ideas are permitted to intrude, this is the main c aus e of politic al apathy . And, s adly , the one thing whic h would do the mos t to reinvigorate democ rac y -- a parliamentary s y s tem whic h c an dis s olve a dy s func tional government in a heartbeat -- is c ons titutionally unlik ely . The Founding Fathers really s c rewed things up. Login or regis ter to pos t c omments s earc h The National Interes trc h Sea Sec urity Soc iety Ec onomic s Politic s Magaz ine Artic les Blogs Videos Global Governanc e Regions Subs c ribe Digital nationalinter est.or g /commentar y/the- case- compulsor y- voting - 7691 2/2...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online