Debate_ In a democracy, voting ought to be compulsory _ Debate

rat her t han st raight lines 100 say yes con are et

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: on are et hically t roubling, t hough t his is not obv iously so. There is no reason t o suppose t hat people should be equally int erest ed in polit ics at all t imes, or t hat all people should find v ot ing equally sat isfact ory .(st oker,2006) Abov e all, it is morally and polit ically import ant t o dist inguish amongst different t y pes of non-v ot ers. There may be reasons t o be t roubled by t hose who do not v ot e because t hey are not part icularly excit ed by any candidat es, or because t hey are disenchant ed by t heir fav ored polit ical Part y " as t he failure t o v ot e may point t o deep-seat ed weaknesses in t he compet it iv e part y sy st em, and in t he organizat ion and ideology of t he main polit ical part ies. But t hese problems, real as t hey are, seem far less urgent t han t hose of t he people who do not v ot e because v ot ing and polit ical part icipat ion of any form seem as alien and remot e as univ ersit y educat ion, st able, well-paid work, decent housing, safe st reet s, and respect from ot her members of societ y . The difficult y in such cases is t o see how compulsory v ot ing will address, rat her t han exacerbat e, t he alienat ion of t hese non-v ot ers, who are t y pically t he object s, not t he subject s, of polit ical debat e and policy , and who t y pically const it ut e t he "problems" t hat polit icians are compet ing t o solv e. (Irwin and holst ey n, 2005). In t his sit uat ion compulsory v ot ing would impact t he result s negat iv ely . Cont ent ion 2: compulsory v ot in...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/16/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online