Debate_ In a democracy, voting ought to be compulsory _ Debate

Cit izens do not owe t heir gov ernment elect oral

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: t elect oral support or legit imacy .” This claim support s a sy st em where democracy can nev er work effect iv ely . Not only democracy , any inst it ut ion cannot work wit hout a mut ual share of dut ies of t he powerful and t he ruled. The cit izens do hav e a responsibilit y t o v ot e, which in our sy st em, could also be a v ot e of abst ent ion. H ow can cit izens expect t o t ake adv ant age of a democrat ic inst it ut ion wit hout fulfilling t heir own job of placing a v ot e? Except t hose who hav e researched and did not get fascinat ed by a candidat e, all t he ot her cit izens hav e a dut y t o keep t uned wit h t he polit ical part ies and t hen make a decision. Secondly , Con emphasized t hat compulsory v ot ing t akes away t he right of people t o hav e a choice, which Con suggest ed was “ t he point of democracy ” . I would like t o also emphasize t hat in t he proposed mechanism t his choice of t he people will be respect ed. They will be giv en a choice t o v ot e or not and for whom t o v ot e. The proposed mechanism will bot h support t he right s of t he people and ask t hem t o perform t heir dut ies. A r gument 3: Democrat ic Ideals promot ed This argument will be present ed in t he next round. Rema ining r ebutta ls t o Con’s case: Con was worried about t he fines t hat will follow aft er people will not v ot e. Con was right t o say t hat t his would negat iv ely affect t he poor and may increase t he number of criminals who owe fine debt . H owev er, t he mechanism clearly st at es t hat a fine will only hav e t o be paid if one wishes t o regist er again. This will work as an incent...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online