P 2007 seepage face height water table position and

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ogical Survey modular ground-water model—The groundwater flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6–A16, 238 p. Boonstra, Hans, and Soppe, Richard, 2007, Well design and construction, chap. 11 of Delleur, J.W., ed., The handbook of groundwater engineering (2d ed.): Boca Raton, Fla., CRC Press, p. 11.1–11.30. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., 2000, MODFLOW–2000, The U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model—User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–92, 121 p. Chenaf, Djaouida, and Chapuis, R.P., 2007, Seepage face height, water table position, and well efficiency at steady state: Ground Water, v. 45, no. 2, p. 168–177, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00277.x. Church, P.E., and Granato, G.E., 1996, Bias in ground-water data caused by well-bore flow in long-screen wells: Ground Water, v. 34, no. 2, p. 262–273. Cooley, R.L., and Cunningham, A.B., 1979, Consideration of energy loss in theory of flow to wells: Journal of Hydrology, v. 43, p. 161–184. Dougherty, D.E., and Babu, D.K., 1984, Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir: Water Resources Research, v. 20, no. 8, p. 1116–1122. Driscoll, F.G., 1986, Groundwater and wells (2d ed.): St. Paul, Minn., Johnson Filtration Systems, Inc., 1089 p. Earlougher, R.C., Jr., 1977, Advances in well test analysis: Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, Tex., 264 p. Fanchi, J.R., Kennedy, J.E., and Dauben, D.L., 1987, BOAST II: A three-dimensional, three-phase black oil applied simulation tool: U.S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ BC/-88/2/SP. Giddings, Todd, 1987, What is an adequate screen length for monitoring wells? Opinion I: Ground Water Monitoring Review, v. 7, no. 2, p. 96–97. Harbaugh, A.W., and McDonald, M.G., 1996, User’s documentation for MODFLOW–96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–485, 56 p. Izbicki, J.A., Christensen, A.H., and Hanson, R.T., 1999, U.S. Geological Survey combined well-bore flow and depthdependent water sampler: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 196–99, 2 p. Jacob, C.E., 1947, Drawdown test to determine effective radius of artesian well: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, v. 112, p. 1047–1070. Jacob, C.E., 1963, Correction of drawdowns caused by a pumped well tapping less than the full thickness of an aquifer, in Bentall, Ray, ed., Methods of determining permeability, transmissibility and drawdown: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1536–I, p. 272–282. Kaleris, Vasilios, 1989, Inflow into monitoring wells with long screens, in Kobus, H.E., and Kinzelbach, Wolfgang, eds., Contaminant transport in groundwater: Rotterdam, Netherlands, A.A. Balkema, p. 41–50. Konikow, L.F., Goode, D.J., and Hornberger, G.Z., 1996, A three-dimensional method-of-characteristics solute-transport model (MOC3D): U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4267, 87 p. References Cited 43 Konikow, L.F., and Hornberger, G.Z., 2006a, Modeling effects of multi-node wells on solute transport: Ground Water, v. 44, no. 5, p. 648–660, doi: 10.1111/j.17456584.2006.00231.x Peaceman, D.W., 1983, Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, v. 23, no. 3, p. 531–543. Konikow, L.F., and Hornberger, G.Z., 2006b, Use of the Multi-Node Well (MNW) Package when simulating solute transport with the MODFLOW ground-water transport process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6–A15, 34 p. Planert, Michael, 1997, Documentation of a computer program to estimate the head in a well of finite radius using the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite difference ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–651A, 11 p. Kozeny, Josef, 1933, Theorie und berechnung der brunnen: Wasserkraft und Wasserwirtschaft, v. 28, p. 88–92, 101–105, 113–116. Pollock, D.W., 1994, User’s Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH–PLOT, version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U. S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94–464, 248 p. Kruseman, G.P., and de Ridder, N.A., 1990, Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data (2d ed.): Wageningen, Netherlands, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement Publication 47, 377 p. Lacombe, S., Sudicky, E.A., Frape, S.K., and Unger, A.J.A., 1995, Influence of leaky boreholes on cross-formational groundwater flow and contaminant transport: Water Resources Research, v. 31, no. 8, p. 1871–1882. Lohman, S.W., 1972, Ground-water hydraulics: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, 70 p. McDonald, M.G., 1984, Development of a multi-aquifer well option for a modular ground-water flow model, in Proceedings of the...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online