This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: ted each for how persuasive it was.
E.g., eye-witnesses identified shots from the
eye witnesses identified shots from the
“Inadequacy of the “single-bullet theory”
“singleBack and to the left. . . Back and to the. . .
all evid for CTs, asked to rate how believable each piece of evid is. Take 2 extremes (CTs vs LHO believers) reading same evidence. Each side
hearing same evidence and judging what's persuasive/believable simply reﬂects
their prior belief. The stronger prior belief, the more likely to interpret evid as
conﬁrming their prior belief. Not surprising it's hard to persuade ppl because
they're unwilling to accept contrary evidence. Conclusion
Leadership and justifications for war/change
Leadership and justifications for war/change Why?
Manage specific emotions
The CTs contain important information
There is narrative appeal 6...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/21/2014 for the course COMM 109 taught by Professor Reid,s during the Spring '08 term at UCSB.
- Spring '08