Tra86 3 top income shares can change drastically

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ome shifting 2) Heterogeneity in tax responses due to heterogeneity in shifting opportunities [e.g., Kennedy tax cuts of ’61 vs. TRA’86] 3) Top income shares can change drastically without changes in tax rates [e.g., 1993-2000] 4) Difficult to know from single country time series the role played by top tax rate cuts in the surge of top incomes ⇒ International evidence can cast further useful evidence 19 TOP RATES AND TOP INCOMES INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE 1) Use pre-tax top 1% income share data from 18 OECD countries since 1960 using the World Top Incomes Database 2) Compute top (statutory) individual income tax rates using OECD data [including both central and local income taxes]. Plot top 1% pre-tax income share against top MTR in 1960-4, in 2005-9, and 1960-4 vs. 2005-9 20 16 18 A. Top 1% Share and Top Marginal Tax Rate in 1960−4 Top 1% Income Share (%) 8 10 12 14 Elasticity= .07 (.15) Germany Switzerland Netherlands Finland France Canada Japan Spain 6 Australia Australia Sweden NZ Ireland US UK Italy Norway Portugal 4 Denmark 40 50 60 70 Top Marginal Tax Rate (%) 80 90 US Elasticity= 1.90 (.43) UK Canada Ireland Germany Norway Portugal Italy Australia Spain...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/23/2014 for the course ECON 131 taught by Professor Karp during the Spring '07 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online