Presentation1_Rahil_Jain

This so called silent rejecon provides a potent smulus

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ced at $28/cm2*, various cost benefit analyses3 have concluded that Apligraf© improves the quality of life of recipients * As in 2010; [3] Steinberg et. al. Specific Design Constraints •  Op/mize wound healing –  Dermal layer provides necessary proteins, cytokines and growth factors to facilitate healing processes •  Pain relief –  Burt et al (1989) noted that recipient cells replace donor cells at recipient site. –  This so called ‘silent rejec/on’ provides a potent s/mulus for healing and alleviates pain •  Biomechanical proper/es –  Compression therapy, invariantly, accompanies applica/on of Apligraf© and thus biomechanical proper/es are seldom discussed –  However, autologous skin is expected to replace the implant as a part of wound healing Clinical trials and studies •  Trial Design: –  Apligraf© vs AutograQ/Conven/onal therapy with pa/ent being its own control [4,5] –  Apligraf© with and without compression therapy [6] –  Apligraf© vs. other conven/onal therapies [4,7] –  Apligraf© for healing non ­healing wounds [8,9]...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online