{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}


9 bobic and davis a kind word for theory x adapters

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: relatively unoriginal, seeking direction in the execution of their jobs (Aeppel 1997, for example). A manager operating under these assumptions would use a directive approach to managing, allowing employees only limited autonomy and discretion. A Theory X manager is more concerned with performance and “getting product out the door” than about meeting the emotional or developmental needs of his or her subordinates.9 Under what circumstances would Theory X management be appropriate? If we redefine Theory X assumptions as adaptive and Theory Y assumptions as innovative,10 then we may make a number of conclusions about when Theory X management is appropriate. When facing routine or detailed tasks, an adaptive style is most likely to be successful. Kirton argued that adaptive managers are more appropriate when a team is composed of innovators, because the adapter would be able to keep the rest of the team on schedule (Kirton 1989b). Note that even in the Mouton and Blake Managerial Grid, the assumption is that creativity means innovation, rather than adaptation. 10 This is not entirely correct, for it is possible for an adaptive personality to approach management from a Theory Y perspective and vice versa. However, for purposes of discussion, the analogy may be made. 9 Bobic and Davis A Kind Word for Theory X Adapters are also more successful at “doing things better,” while innovators are more successful at “doing things differently” (Korth 2000). What one wants in a manager depends upon the task being performed. Kirton (1978) noted that companies tended to seek out adapters rather than innovators, because adapters tended to fit well into bureaucratic organizations. On the other hand, Holland (1987) demonstrated that adapters had difficulty coping with an industry undergoing rapid change in technology or procedures. Foxall, Payne, and Walters (1987) argued that innovative managers were better suited to tasks that involved external relations for an organization, while adapters were more suited to tasks involving the internal operations of an organization. McNeilly and Goldsmith (1992) note that e...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online