Bobic-and-Davis-A-Kind-Word-for-Theory-X

On the other hand combining kirtons ideas with

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: a system (Wilkinson, Godfrey, and Marchington 1997, 810; Berman and West 1995). The issue is more complicated than tantrums from middle managers. Managers very often understand systems better than their subordinates do. Once again, those who support TQM are usually discussing nonroutine tasks or special projects, while the complaint of middle managers is that TQM is not appropriate for more routine tasks and day-to-day operations (Leidecker and Hall 1986). We find it interesting that Wilkinson, Godfrey, and Marchington (1997) concede that different managers implement TQM differently. Many managers adapted to TQM readily because “this approach matched their preferred style. . . .” Bobic and Davis A Kind Word for Theory X (810). The obvious implication is that any method that expects creativity to be universally innovative is unlikely to succeed in the long run. CONCLUSION This article began by examining the three foundations of McGregor’s THSE. This analysis has revealed weaknesses in these key foundations: Workers face a different work environment than they did in the 1960s, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs has fallen into question, and the concept of creativity is multidimensional. The foundations of Theory Y management and the assumption that Theory Y management is inherently better than Theory X management must be substantially reconsidered. On the other hand, combining Kirton’s ideas with McGregor’s helps to explain the standard anomalies associated with Theory Y management. To those who claim Theory Y is just a hypocritical form of Theory X (Salaman 1979) or that it does not work in the real world, one may respond that the failure is not in the method but in the mismatch of method to manager. These findings also explain why Theory X management persists and why some students of management prefer Theory X assumptions: this theory fits more closely with their styles of creativity. The findings also explain why Staw and Epstein (2000) found no evidence of...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online