Research Analysis Lib Data

While a multitude of studies have documented the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: and a relative increase of 28.1 percent. Overall, however, the basic result of the research is clear: the rate of currently divorced in U.S. counties is typically lower where religious concentration is greater. Summary and Conclusions Although “religious concentration” as a macrosociological variable has been largely ignored in the social science literature, it was found to impact at least one critical area of study in this research, that is, the likelihood of being divorced. While a multitude of studies have documented the influence of such factors as unemployment, urban residence, income, and the employment of females on levels of divorce, the impact of larger, contextual variables (other than region of residence) has remained relatively unknown. Extending Durkheim’s classic theory of religion and its integrative effects on society to the matrix of behaviors that occur within the marital setting, we were able to show that an area’s religious concentration exerts a significant independent effect on the likelihood of marital success. While this variable does not emerge as one of the strongest predictors of divorce in our analysis of covariates, its independent effect remains after the systematic introduction of other variables into a series of regression equations. Just as Durkheim hypothesized that religion serves as an integrative force within society, it also appears to act as an integrative (or stabilizing) influence THE IMPACT OF RELIGIOUS HOMOGENEITY 351 on the institution of marriage. Where people live in relatively homogeneous religious settings (and are presumably more tightly bound together), divorce is lower (and vice versa). More than “religious involvement”—a frequently studied topic in the divorce literature—is apparently involved. In addition to frequency of church attendance (and similar measures of religious involvement) directly impacting divorce rates, the larger community provides another important dimension wherein marital relationships unfold. And, as this research has indicated, one of the community/societal factors that appears to act most directly as a mediating force on the prospects for divorce is religious concentration. Under what conditions does religious homogeneity serve as a positive mediating factor? It may, for example, be indicative of closer community agreement on a more generalized set of normative and moral directives. Where the expectation to remain married is strong and negative sanctions are more apt to be employed for the violation of normative expectations, marriages may be less likely to terminate in divorce—irrespective of frequency of church attendance and other “personal choice” variables. As Blau and others have suggested (Blau, Beeker, and Fitzpatrick 1984), the social structure or “context” in which people live often constrains individual choices. Religion as a part of that context, reinforced by other community institutions and “voices,” apparently exerts an influence independent of that of other structural and social-psychological factors. Where religious differences are not as extreme, it may also mean that people who are marrying across religious lines are characterized by more agreement on values and normative issues—hence, lower divorce rates. Marriages tend to last longer and be characterized by higher levels of marital happiness in areas populated by a smaller number of similar faiths and higher church participation rates (Call and Heaton 1997). Indeed, a long line of research has documented the positive influence of homogamy on mate selection and marriage relationships vis-à-vis the incidence of divorce (Eshleman 1994:241–60). Religious homogamy, regardless of the dimension—affiliation, attendance, or beliefs—suggests similarities between spouses that may translate to more stable and lasting marriages (Call and Heaton 1997). Perhaps Durkheim summed it up best in another area of his work that has not been heretofore addressed: the transition of society from solidarity based upon the “mechanical” to solidarity stemming from increased differentiation and specialization, that is, “organic” (Durkheim 1964). It may be argued that the increasing divorce rate in American society in part reflects this transition, as do a multitude of other social behaviors and institutions (including religion itself ). Thus, homogeneity of religious affiliation is more indicative of mechanical solidarity and its shared beliefs and collective influences, while lack of agreement on religious outlook is more reflective of the organic (and the highly individualistic behaviors that are associated with that orientation). Hence, an absence of generalized agreement on societal values and norms rather than lack of religious 352 LARRY C. MULLINS ET AL. cohesion per se may be the real exacerbating force in today’s elevated divorce r...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/27/2014 for the course SOCI 3040 taught by Professor Lauramckinney during the Fall '13 term at Tulane.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online