Basic Animal Behavior

Utilita r ia nism is ba sed on the ends justify the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: S & a nima ls HAVE r ights. Utilita r ia nism is ba sed on the ' Ends Justify the Mea ns' , how c a n tha t be useful? And, a nima ls ha ve EQUAL utility to huma ns, a nything less is Spec iesism - The ter m, fir st defined by philosopher Peter Singer , used to desc r ibe a bia s fa vor ing the inter ests of one spec ies over the inter ests of a nother - simila r to r a c ism & sexism. So utilita r ia nism F AILS a nd a nima ls DO ha ve r ights. c ) Inher ent Va lue - the suppor ter s of the Rights view believe tha t a nima ls, a s a ll life, ha s a n inher ent va lue a nd a ttempts to limit these r ights to huma ns is r a tiona lly defec tive. Ca n a nima ls suffer ? d) Wha t is a Right? - Must the possessor of a r ight be a ble to ' exper ienc e' tha t r ight? Is it tha t the possessor of a r ight MUST be a n entity whic h c a n logic a lly be spoken of in suc h la ngua ge? Is a n a nima l, though c a pa ble of sensa tion, c onsc iousness a nd suffer ing, nec essa r ily c a pa ble of exer c ising, owning or enjoying a r ight? a nima lsc ie nc e 2.uc da vis.e du/a ns1/ha ndouts/be ha vior .html 2/2...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/24/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online