Unformatted text preview: ent data also place new constraints on the change processes posited by any theory of behavior-induced attitude change.
Self-perception theory and cognitive dissonance theory have depended
on both explicit memory and conscious processing to differing degrees in their explanations of attitude change. Although the current
data do not address either theory’s general viability, they do suggest
that the processing components of these theories need clearer speciﬁcation. Future research integrating the methods of neuroscience into
social cognition should yield clearer speciﬁcation of these processes
(Lieberman, 2000; Ochsner & Lieberman, 2000). Acknowledgments—It is a pleasure to thank Paula Koseff, Michelle
Woodbury, and Annapurna Duleep for their contributions. This research
was supported in part by McDonnell-Pew grants to Matthew Lieberman
(JSMF 99-25 CN-QUA.05) and Kevin Ochsner (JSMF 98-23 CMQUA.04), National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. RO1-MH56075 to
Daniel Gilbert, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Center Grant No. NS26985 awarded to Boston University. 139 VOL. 12, NO. 2, MARCH 2001
Downloaded from pss.sagepub.com at COLUMBIA UNIV on April 18, 2013 PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Attitude Change in Amnesics
Aesop. (1961). Aesop without morals: The famous fables and a life of Aesop (L.W. Daly,
ed. & trans.). New York: Barnes and Co.
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a
unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 7(9, Whole No. 416).
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic inﬂuence in social
perception and cognition. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought
(pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford Press.
Bargh, J.A., & Tota, M.E. (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression:
Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 925–939.
Bem, D.J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 1, 199–218.
Brehm, J.W. (1956). Post-decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.
Brehm, J.W., & Cohen, A.R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York:
Brock, T.C., & Grant, L.D. (1963). Dissonance, awareness and motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 53–60.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information
processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh
(Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.
Elliot, A.J., & Devine, P.G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance:
Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonanc...
View Full Document
This document was uploaded on 01/26/2014.
- Fall '13
- Cognitive Dissonance