Bragdon Nassaney essay

Bragdon Nassaney essay - Grave Goods and Persistence...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Grave Goods and Persistence through Change Archaeology has begun a revolution away from theory and toward the study of practice. Instead of focusing on the large scale of identity formation, archaeologists have become increasingly fascinated with la vie quotidienne —those mundane, everyday routines that help to characterize identity in preconscious ways. Still, as much criticism as has battered those who emphasize it, culture remains on some level an important focus in studying the history of people. Daily habits are in themselves cultural rituals, and words like “doxa,” meant to be associated with practice theory, reflect as a clouded glass the generalized idea of culture. Important distinctions exist between cultural theorists and practice theorists, but some areas of study help to link these two lenses, to turn the telescopic into the binocular, in order to form a more cohesive picture of a people. One such area of study is that of mortuary customs. Not only does it reflect the culture, the system of meanings established by a group, through its spiritual importance, it also illuminates important practical and political implications considered important to practice theorists. Death is unique in that it is at once deeply personal and tragic, but also common and ordinary. For this reason, many archaeologists and anthropologists find it an interesting and important subject of examination. Both Dr. Bragdon and Dr. Nassaney rank among this group of scholars. Both study the Native American groups of southern New England—and both examine grave goods. Needless to say, this could easily be where the similarities end. In general, the range of theoretical approaches researchers take makes direct substantiation by other researchers incredibly improbable (Joyce 367). But the assessments performed by Bragdon and Nassaney seem to complement each other; in fact, Nassaney seems to present an expansion of Bragdon’s ideas, some answers to her questions, while maintaining, of course, his particular focus on Native American gender roles. Both establish the individual character of burial before European contact in contrast to the cemetery form of burial after the colonists’ arrival (Bragdon 25 Oct.; Nassaney 343). They also both emphasize the overall increase in grave goods, as well as the more specific, concentric increase in costly signaling behavior regarding mortuary customs (Bragdon 25 Oct.; Nassaney 343). Bragdon posed a series of questions regarding this shift, concentrating on the central idea
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/08/2008 for the course ANTH 312 taught by Professor Brown during the Fall '07 term at William & Mary.

Page1 / 4

Bragdon Nassaney essay - Grave Goods and Persistence...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online