{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Prejudice Chapter Notes

Prejudice Chapter Notes - Schmitt Branscombe and...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Schmitt, Branscombe, and Postmes (2003): participants believed taking part in a study concerning job interviews each participant received identical negative feedback 1. interviewer jerk, gives everyone a negative evaluation (nonsexist external attribution) 2. particular interviewer sexist gives all women bad evaluation but positive toward men (lone sexist) 3. all interviewers sexist (pervasive sexism) feelings of self-esteem based on gender and overall positive mood worsened when prejudicial outcome was seen as also likely to occur in other situations when discrimination isolated, self-esteem and mood didn’t differ Hornsey and Hogg (2000) when the distinctiveness of their subgroup was not threatened individuals reported less bias toward an out-group compared with when it was dissimilar. when the distinctiveness of their subgroup had been threatened participants expressed more bias toward an out-group that was described as similar to their own Aarts and Dijksterhuis 2003
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}