7 specifying a steps rule when you add a new step the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: is faster using the tool bar. However some sentences must be entered using the keyboard, since the predicates, names, or sentence letters may not appear on the tool bar. For example, you will have to type parts of the sentence P → (Q ∨ R), since P, Q, and R don’t appear on the tool bar. 36 / LPL Software Manual Figure 4.2: Using hierarchical menus to specify rules. 4.2.6 Deleting steps To delete a step, focus on the step and choose Delete Step from the Proof menu. If you delete the assumption step of a subproof (the step just above the Fitch bar), the entire subproof containing that step will be deleted. Be careful in deleting assumption steps, since you could lose a lot of work. If you simply want to change the assumption, just edit the sentence. You can either cut or delete a range of steps by using the selection rectangle on the tool bar. Use the rectangle tool to select the steps you want and then cut or delete them. 4.2.7 Specifying a step’s rule When you add a new step, the word “Rule?” appears to the right of the step. To specify a rule for the step, click down on the word “Rule?” A popup menu will appear. This menu has five submenus plus the rule of Reit. The submenus are attached to Intro, Elim, Con, Lemma, and Induction. Moving the cursor over these submenus will cause a second menu to appear with a list of further options. To specify the rule of, say, Negation Introduction, first move the cursor over the item Intro. Then, when the second menu appears, move the cursor to the item ¬ (or “not”) and release the mouse button. This operation is illustrated in Figure 4.2. Similarly, to specify the rule of Taut Con, first move the cursor over the item Con and then choose Taut from the second menu. You can also specify a rule from the keyboard, by typing the Using Fitch / 37 Table 4.1: Keystroke equivalents for specifying rules. Rule Equiv Rule Equiv ∧ Elim ∨ Elim ¬ Elim ⊥ Elim → Elim ↔ Elim Opt(Alt)-& Opt(Alt)-| Opt(Alt)-∼ Opt(Alt)- ˆ Opt(Alt)-$ Opt(Alt)-% ∧ Intro ∨ Intro ¬ Intro ⊥ Intro → Intro ↔ Intro Shift-Opt(Alt)-& Shift-Opt(Alt)-| Shift-Opt(Alt)-∼ Shift-Opt(Alt)- ˆ Shift-Opt(Alt)-$ Shift-Opt(Alt)-% = Elim ∀ Elim ∃ Elim Opt(Alt)-= Opt(Alt)-@ Opt(Alt)-/ = Intro ∀ Intro ∃ Intro Shift-Opt(Alt)-= Shift-Opt(Alt)-@ Shift-Opt(Alt)-/ Reit Taut Con Opt(Alt)-R Opt(Alt)-T FO Con Ana Con Opt(Alt)-F Opt(Alt)-A appropriate keystroke equivalent. A list of these appears in Table 4.1. Note that in using these keyboard equivalents, you should not hold down the shift key unless it is explicitly mentioned in the table. For example, to specify the rule ∀ Elim, you will actually type Option-2 (Macintosh) or Alt-2 (Windows); holding down the shift key will change the rule to ∀ Intro instead. In most cases, we have listed the shifted (“uppercase”) characters because they are easier to remember. For example, it is easier to remember that ∧ Elim is Option-& than to think of it as Option-7. 4.2.8 Changin...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online