This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: arn of the managers’ trustworthiness, consistent
with delayed feedback in naturally occurring settings (Palmrose 1994). The auditor knows
that he will not pay a penalty for rounds when a manager is sanctioned; however, this
sanction information tells the auditor nothing about the manager’s fraud level because the
frequency of sanctions depends entirely on the audit level, a feature known by the auditor
(see Table 1).
In contrast, managers who are sanctioned do learn the audit levels. However, auditors
do not know that the managers learn this. I chose not to inform auditors that their managers
receive information about audit levels (when the auditor detects fraud) to lessen auditors’
ability to signal the audit level to managers and thus become a leader, as in a leader/
follower game.7 Thus, auditors’ information restrictions limit them from forming a justiﬁable basis for trusting managers. These conditions create a fertile environment for selfserving biases to arise.
At the end of the reg...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/27/2014 for the course ACCY 405 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.
- Fall '08