# In like fashion i construct the managers fraud index

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: the trust audit, 1 to the Nash audit, and 2 to the defensive audit. I summed these values over the total number of periods (18 or 19) and then divided by the number of periods. This value is then multiplied by 100 to yield the audit index for each auditor. For example, consider an auditor who selected the trust audit nine times, the Nash audit six times, and the defensive audit three times, out of 18 total choices. The audit index of 66.67 is calculated as ((9 0 6 1 3 2)/18). A lower index score indicates the auditor is more trusting of the manager, and a high index indicates the auditor is less trusting. In like fashion, I construct the manager’s fraud index by assigning a value of 0 to the cooperate fraud level, 1 to the Nash fraud level, and 2 to the cheat fraud level. Thus, a lower index score indicates the manager is more cooperative, and a high score indicates a greater propensity to cheat. The third measure is the ex post payoff difference index. This measure applies to each au...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 01/27/2014 for the course ACCY 405 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online