{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

E without mention of fraud audit or self serving bias

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: basis, and the results may not generalize to market or organizational settings. Third, I used student-subjects for the experiment rather than experienced auditors and managers. This may not be a material shortcoming for two reasons. First, previous research concludes that student-subjects may be most appropriate in experiments that do not incorporate mundane realism (Ball and Cech 1996). Second, Bazerman et al.’s (1997) conclusion was based on research that used student-subjects, and it seems reasonable to use the same subject pool to investigate the robustness of their conclusions. Another potential limitation of the research is that the experiment is devoid of context (i.e., without mention of fraud, audit, or self-serving bias). As Haynes and Kachelmeier (1998) suggest, context can affect subject behavior in important ways. Future research could modify this setting to incorporate a more realistic context. One possibility is to build on Kadous et al. (2001) to investigate how motivated reasoning might affect auditor-subjects’ strategies,...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online